![]()
Vision Aware
José Bragança Pinheiro
Frontiers are nothing more than boundaries built by men, a figment of the mind. Humankind is unique in the ability to create problems for which he will then spend a disproportionate amount of energy solving. Interoperability fits in this group. To be clear, I’m speaking of toll interoperability, where the vehicle identification and the tariff charging have been responsible for the life and death of thousands of pages and arguments, including this one.
For the past decade my company has been investing in several of the streams now discussed and followed in countries where road user charging is being adopted. Our product development lines produced 5.8GHz antennas and on-board units ready for action and conducted European and North-American field-tests with 5.9GHz bringing vehicles and infrastructure together in the therapy chaise-longue, when IoT1 was just a bunch of letters from the word coiote. It comes as no surprise that I am a firm believer for a radio-frequency solution, likely being the best way to go. But in the meantime business cannot stop and at some point, each toll operator makes a decision and marches on.
There was a time where each foreign car was considered an outlaw using our tolled motorways, just for having a different logic of arranging numbers and letters in their license plates. The National Road Authority quickly understood that a solution could only arise from combining the experience and backstage knowledge for dealing with payments, operational processes and technologic prowess. The result was an invitation to apply vision for vehicle identification and automatic association with a credit card. Suddenly, as we recently focus in markets such as Europe and USA – deeply involved in coming up with the Interoperability next best thing – did we realize something surprising for its simplicity. Just by looking inside our home base where things are by some sort of black magic, working. Vision based solutions are already in the field. They serve us with enforcement, video tolling, car inspections and cross-border tolling. They contribute enormously to revenue assurance and even toll leakage control. Having a vision became, all of a sudden, a literal realization of what was to be.
Vision technology applied to license plate reading has a bad reputation, owed to a shady past where confidence levels failed to impress and couldn’t justify the investment. Is it still like this? Take accuracy. We live in a time where just by filming a bag of chips MIT is able to reproduce what is being said in the room where it lays (no punt intended). The competitive landscape for digital video cameras is aggressive and prices have gone tumbling down, while quality rose exponentially.
From where we all stand today, the best path to follow is unclear. Roadside and vehicle technology has been in the center of this commotion, where a global solution must define a process up there and beyond it, regardless of the “chosen ones” down below. I would even dare to say, agnostic to. ATI and IBTTA are following this righteous path, separating backoffice and roadside, with the Interoperability Hub and the National Interoperability Committee, where Interface Control is fundamental for the first and standardized technology protocol to the latter. But how to spend energy defining the back process that supports all when there is so much disarray beneath? In the US market alone, expected to double in 10-years’ time, we have today seven different technologies on the roadside and vehicle. What if there was already something to focus on, something that would provide business assurance whilst creating the opportunity for stabilizing the above layer of the solution? The knowledge of the overall processes is critical. It allows designing each clog so that when a clear decision is made for which roadside technology prevails, you don’t need to change everything. Using vision as a means for business continuity and revenue assurance has already given proof in several applications. It’s getting better by the minute, shredding old prejudice. It may even fall short in the end, but by then our collective minds have already figured out if it’s 5.8GHz, 5.9, 6C, Satellite or NFC.
1 IoT stands for “Internet-of-Things”, just in case you’ve been dodging the “trend-train”.